Judgements Search Made Easy

Find Judgements on all Sections and Judgements by all Courts

Filter Judgements by Category and Subcategory.

Judgement By Sections or Articles

Select some options

Judgement Court

Select some options

Judgement Year

Select Judgment Year

Judgement Bench

Select Bench/Beches

Judgements

K. Srinivas vs K. Sunita

In these circumstances, we find that the Appeal is well founded and deserves to be allowed. We unequivocally find that the Respondent-Wife had filed a false criminal complaint, and even one such complaint is sufficient to constitute matrimonial cruelty.Dissolve the marriage of the parties under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa

We, therefore, feel that though offence punishable under Section 498- A of the IPC is not compoundable, in appropriate cases if the parties are willing and if it appears to the criminal court that there exist elements of settlement, it should direct the parties to explore the possibility of settlement through mediation.

Satvinder Kaur vs State (Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi)

After remand, the High Court heard learned counsel for the parties and quashed the F.I.R. on the ground that Investigating Officer at Delhi was not having territorial jurisdiction.

Smt. Rashmi Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar Bhada

Considered from this perspective, we hold that the High Court was wholly wrong in quashing the complaint/proceedings, under Section 432 of the Code. The appeal is accordingly allowed. The judgment of the High Court is set aside. We make it clear that all the observations in the judgment on merits are only to find out prima facie case whether the High Court would be justified in the exercise of its power under Section 482.

ANIL BHARDWAJ VERSUS THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

Appointment Committee dated 18.07.2018 by which proceedings the appellant was not considered suitable for being appointed to the post of District Judge (Entry Level). On the basis of a complaint by the wife of the appellant, a criminal case was registered and vide judgment dated 18.09.2019 the appellant was acquitted of the charge framed against him.

Divisional Controller,Ksrtc vs M.G.Vittal Rao

Be that as it may, the learned Single Judge had granted relief to the delinquent employee which was not challenged by the present appellant by filing writ appeal. Therefore, the delinquent employee is entitled for the said relief.

Dy.Inspector Gen.Of Police & Anr vs S.Samuthiram

n other words, the issue whether an employee has to be reinstated in service or not depends upon the question whether the service rules contain any such provision for reinstatement and not as a matter of right. Such provisions are absent in the Tamil Nadu Service Rules.

Kishan Singh (D) Thru Lrs vs Gurpal Singh & Ors

The only question for our consideration involved in this appeal is as to whether criminal proceedings can be quashed by the High Court relying upon a finding of Civil Court on an issue involved in criminal proceedings in respect of the same subject matter.

Avtar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors

The Court has considered the cleavage of opinion in various decisions on the question of suppression of information or submitting false information in the verification form as to the question of having been criminally prosecuted, arrested or as to pendency of a criminal case.